Stanley Kurtz: The (Whole) Truth About Obama’s ‘Catholic Roots’

…Obama’s vaunted praise of Cardinal Bernardin and his proselytizing alliance with the Catholic Church are not what they appear to be (or what theNew York Times makes them out to be). Obama and his organizing mentors were simply running Alinsky’s game on the Catholic Church, promising to help advance its goals, while in reality coopting the clergy to leftist political ventures at odds with their intent.

Young Barack Obama has come a long way. It’s tough not to wonder whether this Thursday might present him with an opportunity to run Saul Alinsky’s game on the Pope.

Read more

CHINA’S THIRTY YEARS WAR AGAINST ITS OWN PEOPLE

Population Research Institute
Weekly Briefing 10/05/2010, Vol. 12, No. 27
pop.org
by Steve Mosher, President PRI

I was surprised when Beijing decided to celebrate (!) the thirtieth anniversary of the One-Child Policy this week.   I thought, quite frankly, that the declaration of a national day of mourning would have been more appropriate.

But I was even more taken aback when the head of China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission, a woman named Li Bin, announced that China would continue to enforce this same Draconian policy for “decades” to come.

Decades?   This is, after all, a policy that has led to a slaughter of the innocents of Biblical proportions. Hundreds of millions of
women have been forcibly aborted and sterilized.   Homes have been razed, livestock confiscated, and exorbitant fines levied.
In all, 400 million people are missing from the Chinese population as a result of the one-child policy.   Like previous Chinese
Communist Party-orchestrated disasters such as the Great Leap Forward, or the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, this policy, too, has been a disaster for the Chinese people.

I should know.  I was in China when the one-child policy began, 30 years ago.

What I saw then, living in an agricultural commune in rural Guangdong, rivals anything that happened in Nazi Germany.
One day in 1980 several hundred young mothers, all pregnant with second or higher-order children, were ordered to attend
population control meetings.   There they were told that they would all have to abort their pregnancies.  Those who refused
were arrested for the “crime” of being pregnant and locked up until they, too, buckled under the pressure and submitted to
an abortion.

At that point they were taken to the local medical clinic and given a lethal injection into their uterus.   If their bodies did
not expel their dead or dying babies within two days, they were subjected to a cesarean section abortion.   Most horrific
of all, babies born alive were killed by means of an injection of formaldehyde into the “soft spot” on the crown of their heads.
Those few women who managed to escape arrest and had their babies in secret were assessed heavy fines.

Everything that I witnessed then, from the forced abortions of women in the third-trimester of pregnancy to government-
sanctioned infanticide, is still happening now.  Those women who manage to avoid the dragnet by going into hiding are now
subjected to even heavier fines, which currently run three to five times the family’s annual income.  Those who can’t pay this
huge amount have had their homes destroyed and their possessions and livestock confiscated.

Moreover, such a child remains a “black child,” that is, one who does not exist in the eyes of the state.   Such children are
nonpersons, turned away from the government clinic if they fall ill, barred from attending a government school of any kind, and not considered for any kind of government employment later in life.   They are not allowed to marry or start families of their own, since the government has decreed that “black children” will not be allowed to reproduce.   One generation of illegals is enough.

The Chinese government, supported by foreign population control zealots, believe that its program should be held up as
a population control role model for the rest of the world.  In reality, it should be roundly condemned for its widespread
and systematic violations of human rights, especially the rights of women.

But even those who shy away from defending China’s brutal repression of its population sometimes argue in favor of the
one-child policy on other grounds.   China is often held up by the UN Population Fund, for example-as a positive example
of a county that has been able to slow population growth rates dramatically, and which has achieved prosperity as a result.
But to praise the country that has become the ugly poster child of forced abortion and coerced sterilization for the economic
growth that these inhuman policies have supposedly generated is not only inconsistent, but also wrong.

China is clearly worse off economically as a result of eliminating from its population 400 million of the most productive and
enterprising people the world has ever known.   China’s astonishing economic performance-its annual GDP growth over the past three decades is close to 10%-is not only a tribute to the tremendous work ethic of the Chinese people, but also has
led to labor shortages in China’s coastal provinces.   Every baby born in China today is a net economic asset.   How
much more would China have been able to achieve with an even larger population?

Some would argue that adding people would overburden the Chinese environment, but the PRC has been an ecological
disaster zone from the time of Mao’s forced-pace industrialization programs in the 1950s.  The same remains
true today, as the Chinese leadership remains far more concerned about the economic growth rate than about ensuring
that the populace has clean air to breathe and clean water to drink. Witness the government-mandated shutdown of all
factories in the Beijing region in the days leading up to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing.   Once the athletes (and the
foreign journalists) were gone, the smokestacks resumed spewing out their plumes of black smoke.  Nothing had
changed.   This is to say that the sorry state of China’s environment has far more to do with misguided political decisions, and the lack of public accountability for the actions of both government and privately owned businesses, than it does with the number of people.

The one-child policy has been a social disaster as well.  Two generations of Chinese have grown up with no siblings, no
cousins, and no aunts and uncles.  This radical shrinking of the boundaries of the family is, in itself, is a great poverty.
Then there is a problem of female infanticide and sex selective abortion, which has eliminated tens of millions of little girls
from the population, leaving an equal number of young men without brides to marry.   Prostitution, homosexuality, and
gang activity are on the rise as a result.

Finally, there is the demographic snare that the one-child policy has set for the Chinese people.   Because of the radical cutback in births, the Chinese population is aging faster than any human population in human history.  The worker/dependency ratio is unsustainable.   How can an only child support two parents and four grandparents in retirement?   I am afraid that this will lead the Chinese government to embark upon a “one-grandparent
policy” in years to come, in which tens of millions of elderly Chinese will be urged to accept euthanasia, perhaps in return
for their only grandchild being allowed to go to college. Forced abortion and forced euthanasia are two sides of the same
debased coin.

For all its failings, I do think that the one-child policy has served one important purpose as far as the Chinese Communist Party is concerned: It has helped to maintain the muscular rigor of the one-party dictatorship that rules China.   China is a police state, after all, and such a state, to remain strong, must have something to police.   Economic controls have been loosened over the past 30 years, so control over other aspects of life must be tightened.  The brutal one-child policy is one consequence of such a system’s relentless drive for control over people’s lives.

Do I think that the Chinese Communist Party really intends to continue, as Li Bin asserts, its one-child policy “decades” into
the future?   Absolutely.   And it will certainly never admit that the policy was a mistake.   One-party dictatorships don’t make mistakes of such consequence-at least if they want to stay in power.

Submitted by Jerry V.

After McCarthy, Communism “morphed” into the New Left, Counter Culture, Big Labor, Civil Rights, Anti War and Woman’s Liberation Movements, and plethora of NGO’s, Liberal, Zionist, and Gay Rights groups.

“A SECRET WELL-ORGANIZED WORLD POWER”

Bella Dodd was circumspect about the people behind the Communist Party. She once was told to phone two multi-millionaires who live in the Waldorf Towers if she lost contact with Moscow. Elsewhere, she refers to “a secret well organized world power.” She is obviously afraid to be candid. She suspects that one CPUSA leader’s “suicide” was in fact murder. (172)

But she does drop a possible clue. She says that each of the nine floors of the party-owned headquarters at 35 E. 12th St. was devoted to CPUSA business. The Sixth Floor held “the publication offices of the Yiddish newspaper, the Freiheit, and the “Jewish Commission.” (162) Indeed Jews were prominent among Communist dupes.

“What now became clear to me was the collusion of these two forces: the Communists with their timetable for world control, and certain mercenary forces in the free world bent on making profits from blood.” (229)

As “one piece of the puzzle that finally became a picture,” Dodd tells the story of the ship “Erica Reed” typical of “hundreds of other stories.” During the Spanish Civil War, Americans donated money to load the ship with medical supplies and food for Spain. The Communists diverted the ship to Russia instead. (89)

Censorship is crucial to Communists, Dodd says. “I have often seen leaders pull books from shelves in homes and warn members to destroy them.”(223)

Communism is essentially a deceitful system of international elite control. It was not suppressed during the McCarthy era. Rather it morphed into the New Left, Counter Culture, Civil Rights, Anti War and Woman’s Liberation Movements, and later into a plethora of elite-sponsored NGO’s, and media, Democratic and Republican party factions, Liberal, Zionist, Labor, and Gay Rights groups. Like the CPUSA itself, these groups are controlled from the top so their memberships are unaware of being used.

To the objection that some of the above mentioned groups oppose globalization, Dodd refers to examples where the CPUSA ostensibly supported causes they wished to sabotage. (205)

In conclusion, Communism was/is a plot designed to substitute a cabal of the rich for the rule of God. It is a utopian fraud hatched by the rich to thwart the dreams of ordinary people and stunt human progress. The same cabal is behind most wars including the impending attack on Iraq.

A precursor to the new world order, Communism espouses brotherhood, peace and equality in order to deceive us. It has taken over society’s eyes, ears, mind and spirit. Much of what passes for truth in the media and schools is part of this monstrous con job. The expression “politically correct” in widespread use in America is an old Communist Party term. Our politicians are mostly traitors.

Feminism is Communist both in origin and spirit. It pretends to champion women but in fact neuters both sexes and destroys the basic social unit, the family. The promotion of homosexuality as a “lifestyle choice” for heterosexuals is also part of this brazen elitist fraud designed to “create new types of human beings who would conform…”

Western Civilization is like a ship floundering in a sea of evil, yet the passengers are too duped and distracted to realize it. Bella Dodd had the courage to sound the alarm 50 years ago. It is never too late to begin to resist tyranny.

There are no lifeboats.

Read the entire article