Obama and company resolve the Iranian nuke crisis with a sweeping compromise!


by Doug Lawrence

The Iranian “nuke” quandary has the Middle East on the brink of war, with Israel said to be preparing an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities,  (you may prefer to pronounce it “nucular”) as this is being written.

Fortunately for the world, the Obama administration has arrived at an extraordinary compromise, the brilliance of which is only now beginning to be appreciated by free people, all around the globe. (Those Nobel Peace Prize folks were obviously quite right about President Obama. God bless them!)

According to President Obama, the Iranians would be allowed to produce unlimited quantities of nuclear materials … and weaponize them, at will … but as soon as any fully functional weapon was produced, it would immediately be “titled” to the Israelis … even though the weapon would still remain in the Iranian weapons inventory, available for use.

In this way, the problem of Iranian nuclear weapons would disappear forever … and virtually overnight, since every Iranian nuclear weapon that was ever produced would technically belong to Israel … and any alleged Iranian nuclear attack on Israel could then be viewed as nothing more than the Israelis using one of their own nuclear weapons on themselves … thus averting a wider war.

A private insurance company would administer the program and cover all the costs … since the Iranians have refused to pay for the manufacture of Israeli “nukes”… citing religious objections. 

Unconfirmed sources suggest that credit for this brilliant and extraordinary bit of diplomacy belongs primarily to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and close presidential adviser David Axelrod.

While Iran has reportedly already signed off on the program, Israel has not. But highly placed sources within the administration say it’s highly unlikely that Israel would fail to go along with this unprecedented Obama Administration initiative for “Peace In Our Time”.

Obama’s Catholic Compromise

photo: Israel Matzav

Obama’s so-called “accommodation” changes nothing of moral substance and fails to remove the assault on religious liberty and the rights of conscience.

It is no answer to respond that the religious employers are not “paying” for this aspect of the insurance coverage.  For one thing, it is unrealistic to suggest that insurance companies will not pass the costs of these additional services on to the purchasers.  More importantly, abortion-drugs, sterilizations, and contraceptives are a necessary feature of the policy purchased by the religious institution or believing individual.  They will only be made available to those who are insured under such policy, by virtue of the terms of the policy.

It is morally obtuse for the administration to suggest (as it does) that this is a meaningful accommodation of religious liberty because the insurance company will be the one to inform the employee that she is entitled to the embryo-destroying “five day after pill” pursuant to the insurance contract purchased by the religious employer.

Read more

Editor’s note: Obama and his entire administration are real Philistines when it comes to religious matters! Look for him to take a big fall … just like Goliath, another famous Philistine … come November.

Chicago mayor Daley wants to impose a mandatory insurance policy on gun owners


If Mr. Daley was a real man, he would know that the right to bear arms is not to be infringed … even by impotent, liberal, corrupt politicians, who can’t or won’t enforce the law, even in their own cities.

United States Constitution

Amendment 2 – The Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Editor’s note: I’ve been waiting to use this photo for a long time. Thanks, Mr. Mayor!

Another interesting article here

The Marriage Penalty in Health Care

Conservatives have been exchanging email for weeks about the shocking fact that Obama’s health care bill discriminates against marriage while financially favoring unmarried couples living together. This fact is finally getting national attention, at least in the Wall Street Journal and on Fox News.

Here is the cost in the House bill for an unmarried couple who each earn $25,000 a year (total: $50,000). When they both buy health insurance (which will be mandatory), the combined premiums they pay will be capped at $3,076 a year.

But if the couple gets married and has the same combined income of $50,000, they will pay annual premiums up to a cap of $5,160 a year. That means they have to fork over a marriage penalty of $2,084.

The marriage penalty is the result of the fact that government subsidies for buying health insurance are pegged to the federal poverty guidelines. Couples that remain unmarried are rewarded with a separate health care subsidy for each income.

When the Wall Street Journal reporter quizzed the Democratic authors of the health care bill, they made it clear that this differential was deliberate. The staffer justified the discriminatory treatment because “you have to decide what your goals are.”

Read more

Submitted by Nancy W.

The Abortion President on the National Health Care Bill

Doctor-Obama-300x276

According to an email about the national health care bill that I recently received from Barack Obama, the ABORTION President:

“It’s time to fix our unsustainable insurance system and create a new foundation for health care security. That means guaranteeing your health care security and stability with eight basic consumer protections”

No discrimination for pre-existing conditions (editor’s note: Discrimination for ALL conditions!)
No exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses, deductibles or co-pays (editor’s note: Just exorbitant taxes at every level!)
No cost-sharing for preventive care (editor’s note: The taxpayers will foot the entire bill!)
No dropping of coverage if you become seriously ill (editors’ note: They’ll simply withhold or delay treatment and you’ll die!)
No gender discrimination (editors’ note: Except for abortion, where women are authorized to kill other women at a rate greater than 50%.)
No annual or lifetime caps on coverage
(editor’s note: If you’re too sick or too old, you get an aspirin and are then expected to die for your country!) 
Extended coverage for young adults (editor’s note: Code words for government funded abortion!)
Guaranteed insurance renewal so long as premiums are paid (editor’s note: Paid by whom and with what?)

Somebody ought to take some time to read the bill.

Obama obviously hasn’t!

Urge Congress to stop “Drive-Through” Mastectomies!

nurseb.jpg 

Breast Cancer Petition. Urge Congress to stop “Drive-Through” Mastectomies!

Something important for you to consider, from a nurse:

“I’ll never forget the look in my patients eyes when I had to tell them they had to go home with the drains, new
exercises and no br east. I remember begging the Doctors to keep these women in The hospital longer, only to hear that they would, but their hands were tied by the insurance companies.

So there I sat with my patients, giving them the instructions they needed to take care of themselves, knowing full well they didn’t grasp half of what I was saying, because the glazed, hopeless, frightened look spoke louder than the quiet ‘Thank You’ they muttered.”

A mastectomy is when a woman’s breast is removed in order to remove cancerous breast cells/tissue. If you know anyone who has had a Mastectomy, you may know that there is a lot of discomfort and pain afterwards. Insurance companies are trying to make mastectomies an outpatient procedure.

Let’s give women the chance to recover properly in the hospital for 2 days after surgery.

It takes 2 seconds to do this and is very important .. Please take the time and do it really quick!

Please send this to everyone in your address book. If there was ever a time when our voices and choices should be heard, this is one of those times.

There’s a bill called the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act which will require Insurance Companies to cover a minimum 48-hour hospital stay for patients undergoing a mastectomy. It’s about eliminating the ‘drive-through mastectomy’ where women are forced to go home just a few hours after surgery, against the wishes of their doctor, still groggy from anesthesia and sometimes with drainage tubes still attached.

Lifetime Television has put this bill on their Web page with a petition drive to show your support. Last year over half the House signed on.

PLEASE!! Sign the petition by clicking on the link below.

http://www.mylifetime.com/community/my-lifetime-commitment/breast-cancer/petition/breast-cancer-petition

Submitted by Darling D.